Legal Opinion

Edward W. Daniel Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 10, 1971No. C.D. 4264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NewmaN, Judge:

The issue in this case concerns the proper rate of duty on certain articles imported from West Germany in 1967, invoiced as “Plain Eye Bolts” and “Shoulder Eye Bolts”.1 The merchandise was assessed with duty by the district director of customs at the port of Cleveland, Ohio at the rate of 19 per centum ad valorem under the provision in item 657.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) for “Other” articles of iron or steel, not coated or plated with precious metal.

Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 10.5 per centum ad valorem…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummins Engine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  2. Algoma Tube Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API