Legal Opinion

Kolars v. Katolicky Delnik

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1936No. 30,693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Plaintiff sued to recover the reasonable value of the services he rendered in the merger of the Western Bohemian Catholic Union with defendant Katolicky Delnik, both being fraternal beneficiary associations, the first mentioned being organized and existing under the laws of Iowa and defendant under the laws of this state. Proposals of merger started in 1926, but plaintiff seems not to have been requested to aid until in the spring of 1927, and he was,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Gasser v. Sun Fire OfficeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Glidden Co. v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Old Second National Bank v. Town of MiddletownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daly v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API