Legal Opinion
Danciger Oil & Refining Co. of Texas v. Railroad Commission of Texas
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1933No. Motion No. 10,530 Cause No. 6283PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEDDY, C.
Defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error in this case on the ground that the questions presented for decision are now moot.
This suit involves an attack made by plaintiff in error on a proration order of the Railroad Commission of Texas promulgated under the terms of the oil conservation statutes as they existed prior to August, 1931. The order sought to be annulled expired by its own terms subsequent to the rendition of the judgment in this case. In addition to this, the conservation statutes authorizing the Railroad Commission to regulate the production…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Alejandrino v. QuezonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Technical Radio Laboratory v. Federal Radio CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
- Leonard & Leonard v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
3Cited by37 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Corzelius v. HarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1945
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.