Legal Opinion

Corzelius v. Harrell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1945No. A-167PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

This suit was instituted by H. M. Harrell to set aside certain orders of the Railroad Commission relating to the pro duction of natural gas from the Bammel Field in Harris County. Corzelius and Meineke, one of his lessors, intervened. The orders under attack limited production of natural gas for light and fuel purposes to twenty million cubic feet daily, and provided that production should be prorated only when the average daily production exceeded nineteen million cubic feet for a thirty-day period. The trial court, after withdrawing the case from the. jury, rendered judgment: (1) cancelling…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean WaterTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API