Legal Opinion
Hydratec, Inc. v. Sun Valley 260 Orchard & Vineyard Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1990No. F010885PublishedCited by 17 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiBIASO, J.
This is an appeal from the judgments in three separate actions, all of which arose out of the construction of an irrigation system on certain farm property. One of the defendants, Associated Farm Management, Inc. (AFM), contends the trial court erred by failing to award it costs and attorney fees in one of the actions, where it was the “prevailing party.” In the published portion of this opinion, we determine AFM waived its rights to costs and attorney fees. For this reason, and for the reasons expressed in the unpublished sections of this opinion, we will affirm each of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sepulveda v. ApablasaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Miles California Co. v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Williams v. Santa Maria Joint Union High Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Chaparral Greens v. City of Chula VistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sanabria v. EmbreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Nazemi v. TsengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cenex v. Board of Com'rs for YellowstoneMontana Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.