Legal Opinion

Nortel Networks Inc. v. Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 2011No. B213415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

This appeal requires an interpretation of the Sales and Use Tax Law. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6001 et seq.)1 Nortel Networks Inc. sells telephone switching equipment in California. Income from switch hardware sales is indisputably taxable by the State of California. The question is whether sales tax is imposed on the software that Nortel licenses to operate the switching equipment. The Board of Equalization (the Board) determined that Nortel owed sales tax on software it licensed between January 1994 and December 1997. Nortel paid the tax then sued for a refund.

We conclude that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. PaintCare v. MortensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Downs Racing, LP v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Lucent Technologies v. State Board of Equaliz.California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API