Legal Opinion
Ratliff v. Merck & Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided March 3, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-419-JMHPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ motion to remand [Record No. 13]. Defendant filed a response to Plaintiffs’ motion [Record No. 14] to which Plaintiffs replied [Record No. 15]. The Court now deems this matter ripe for review.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On October 27, 2004, Plaintiff James Ratliff (“Ratliff’), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed suit against Defendant Merck & Company, Inc. in the Pike Circuit Court. The complaint seeks damages for alleged violations of the Kentucky Consumer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Shirley K. Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tankersley v. Martinrea Heavy Stampings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- William R. Harr and Finster Courier, Inc. d/b/a Elite Express v. Julian Hayes and Tracey HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Delaney v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2005
- Howard v. GCHNC3, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Lindsay Construction, LLC v. KesmikaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.