Legal Opinion

Howard v. GCHNC3, LLC

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 7, 2023No. 5:22-cv-00326Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington) ROY HOWARD, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) Civil Action No. 5: 22-326-DCR ) STATE AUTO PROPERTY & ) CASUALTY COPANY, ) ) Intervening Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER GCHNC3, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** Plaintiff Roy Howard has filed a motion to remand this matter to state court. The motion will be granted because the removing defendant has not met its burden of demonstrating that the amount-in-controversy requirement is satisfied. I. Plaintiff Roy Howard visited the Hemp XR…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Thomas P. Loftis v. United Parcel Service, Inc. David Cole, Kenneth AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. King v. Household Finance Corp. IIDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
  5. Ratliff v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API