Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Peppler

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1998No. 97CA1873PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge VOGT.

Kent Peppier, as personal representative of the Estate of Henry Peppier (testator), appeals the district court’s order directing him not to enforce a no-contest clause in testator’s will against Gladys Connelly (beneficiary). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In 1984, testator executed a will which included a bequest of $40,000 to beneficiary, his daughter, and left most of the balance of his estate to his son, who was the personal representative’s father. The 1984 will contained a no-contest clause, which provided that any beneficiary who “directly or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BerglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Harkins v. Crews, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  3. Meier v. Denver United States National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Hayden v. NuzumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re the Estate of Hamill, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Seymour v. BiehslichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Estate of Shumway v. GavetteArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of WiltfongColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Sandstead-Corona v. Sandstead—Implied Trusts—Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. Estate of GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API