Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Hamill

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided November 10, 1993No. 07-93-0051-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellant Robert A. Hamill, Jr. brings this appeal from an order approving the final account of the temporary administrator of the Lena Hamill Estate and distributing the assets of that estate. In two points of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in ordering distribution of assets of the estate to (1) Jane Hamill Jeffrey and Sue Hamill Harrell, and (2) Gloriadine Brashear, Betty Mowry, and Carol Brashear, for the reason that those distributees forfeited their right to take under the will pursuant to an in terrorem clause. 1 For the reasons hereinafter expressed,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Newman v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dulak v. DulakTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. RutherfordTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Estate of Hodges, Matter Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  5. Gunter v. Pogue, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lesikar v. Moon, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Dorman v. Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  3. Soefje v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  4. Hinton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
  5. Hayes v. Rinehart, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API