Hayden v. Nuzum
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
From the statement of facts it is apparent that we are called upon to decide whether or not a condition in a will providing for the forfeiture of a legacy in case the legatee, upon probable cause and in good faith, contests the probate of the will, is a valid condition and works, a forfeiture of the legacy. The result of the decision will depend upon whether such a condition shall be held to be void on the grounds of public policy or whether it is within the legitimate field of private regulation and beyond public concern.
The principal authorities both English and American upon the general…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Calvery v. CalveryTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.