United States v. Tramaglino
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Both appellants contend that no single conspiracy was proved between them and other defendants (not appealing here) who were named as co-conspirators in the indictments and were tried together with these appellants in the district court. The appellants made timely motions below to dismiss the conspiracy count. As a basis for discussing their argument, we will summarize the evidence elicited at trial from which the jury might have found them guilty of conspiring with the other defendants.
Beginning in May 1950, Rosario-, through the medium of one Mejia, made several…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- United States v. BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Daniel Bozza, Charles Mulhearn, Ronald Jones, Michael Pizzo, Salvatore Guarnieri, Anthony Delutro, A/K/A Tony WestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Vincent Martino, John Torrioni, Policardo Despaigne, A/K/A "Paulie," Odell Miller, A/K/A "Pluggy," John Radice, and John PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. SpockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.