Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Natchez Inv. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1931No. 28877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the second appeal of this cause, the decision in the first appeal being reported in 155 Miss. 31, 119 So. 366, on which appeal a statement of the case as it had then developed was made. The constitutionality of chapter 128, Laws of 1918, was upheld, and the contract between the Hartford Accident Indemnity Company and the Natchez Investment Company, Inc., was construed and the bond held to be a bond in accordance with the provisions of section 3, chapter 128, Laws of 1918.

On a remand of the cause to the court below the various materialmen who had furnished material for the building,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Natchez Inv. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. N. O. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Wilson v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Chevron Oil Company v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1968
  5. Maryland Casualty Company v. SauterDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API