Legal Opinion

Holden v. Spier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1902No. 12,128PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error from Saline district court; R. F. Thompson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This was a proceeding instituted in the probate court of Saline county, in the matter of the settlement and distribution of the estate of Nathaniel Head, deceased. O. S. Holden was an heir at law of Nathaniel Head, and was entitled to a share of the estate, which was in course of administration. A partial distribution of the funds belonging to the estate had been ordered by the probate court, and before making distribution the administrators applied to the court for a citation requiring Holden to appear and show cause why certain sums due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. KearneyNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  2. Winkler v. LietmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Proctor v. DicklowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  4. Allen v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Keith v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. In Re the Estate of WernetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Stenson v. H. S. Halvorson Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Woods v. KnottsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API