Legal Opinion

Keith v. Guthrie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1898No. 10541PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Nemaha District Court. R. M. Emery, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

The plaintiff in error"is the executor of the last will of Parthenia J. Keith, deceased. The estate in the hands of the executor consisted of money exclusively. Of this, the husband of the deceased, one Fordyce M. Keith, was entitled under the Statute to one-half. He assigned his distributive portion to one Uri S. Keith, who in turn assigned it to the defendant in error, W. W. Guthrie. At the time these assignments were made, the assignor, Fordyce M. Keith, was indebted to the plaintiff in error; not, however, as executor, but in his own right. The defendant in error, W. W. Guthrie, as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Proctor v. DicklowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Teague v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Myers v. NobleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Holden v. SpierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Estate of Johnson v. BasslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API