Legal Opinion
Roemen v. United States of America
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 28, 2020No. 4:19-cv-04006Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION MICAH ROEMEN, 4:19-CV-4006-LLP Plaintiff, vs. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT PART MOTION TO DISMISS NEUENFELDT, individually and UNKNOWN SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL OF THE UNITED STATES, individually, Defendants. Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 8, filed by defendant, Robert Neuenfeldt (“Neuenfeldt”). For the following reasons, Neuenfeldt’s Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND On June 18, 2017, Plaintiff, Michal…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.