Legal Opinion

Art & Sign Brush Mfg. Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 5, 1955No. C. D. 1697PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests was assessed with duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the President’s proclamation of December 22, 1949, carrying out the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D: 52373, for—

Manufactures wholly or in chief value of wood or bark not specially provided for.

The claim made in each of the protests is for duty at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provision in the said paragraph 412, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Protests 94169-K of Applicator Brush Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Charles Hardy, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API