Legal Opinion

State v. A.R.C.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 15, 2003No. CR-02-1359PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The district attorney for the twenty-second judicial circuit filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge M. Ashley McKathan to set aside his order in the underlying case excluding from evidence the victim’s out-of-court statements. A.R.C. was indicted on a charge of sodomy in the first degree. On April 21, 2003, A.R.C.’s case was called to trial. During trial the district attorney attempted to introduce out-of-court statements made by the victim, who was five years old at the time of trial. The trial court excluded the statements after finding that they were not sufficiently…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. State v. CannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. D.B.Y. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Ex Parte DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. D.B.Y. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Ex Parte DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API