Legal Opinion

Ex Parte King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 2009No. 1071540PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

Janet King, a certified registered-nurse practitioner, was indicted for two alleged violations of § 26-23A-7, Ala.Code 1975, which is part of “The Woman’s Right to Know Act.” The State filed a motion in limine, requesting an order barring King from introducing at trial any evidence relating to her “collaborative practice” with a medical doctor. See §§ 34-21-80 to -93, Ala. Code 1975. The State argued that such evidence was not relevant and that it would confuse the jury. After hearing arguments, the trial court denied the State’s motion in limine.

The State filed a petition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte NiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Parks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Kandola v. State, Cr-10-1132 (ala.crim.app. 7-29-2011)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API