Legal Opinion

BELDOCK v. Town of Charlotte

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 13, 2010No. 2009-007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal from a superior court order granting summary judgment to defendant Town of Charlotte. Plaintiffs argue the Town is required to maintain gates and fences along a Town-owned private lane providing access to plaintiffs’ property. The trial court ruled that the Town “has no obligation or duty to erect, maintain, close, or open any gate(s) at either end” of the lane, nor any “obligation or duty to erect, or maintain any fence(s) along any portion of the length of, or in the vicinity” of the lane. We affirm.

¶ 2. The facts are largely uncontested. In May 1965, landowners Romeo…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Richart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Mann v. LevinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. Creed v. ClogstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Gladchun and Alyssa Gladchun v. Michael Eramo, Diane Eramo and New Cingular Wireless, PCS, D/B/A AT&TSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  2. Fab-Tech, Inc. v. NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Costello v. PeetVermont Superior Court · 2025
  4. Costello v. PeetVermont Superior Court · 2025
  5. Fab-Tech, Inc. v. NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API