McCormick v. Stockton & Tuolumne County Railroad
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Suit on promissory note of date July 30, 1898, for "five thousand seven hundred and ten dollars, with interest, etc. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff against the defendant Rikert, and for the defendant corporation against the plaintiff for costs. The appeal is from the latter judgment; and the sole question involved is whether the note sued on was the note of the latter defendant.
The note is signed, “Annie Kline Rikert, Pres. Stockton and Tuolumne Co. R. R. Co. Annie Rikert Personally,” and is set out at length in the complaint. The answer of the defendant corporation denies that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McKiernan v. LenzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Cox v. North-Western Stage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1871
- Chamberlain v. Pac. Wool-Growing Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Eddy v. American Amusement CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Rummelsburg v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.