Legal Opinion

Averett v. Utah County Drainage District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 26, 1988No. 880239-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Judge:

Appellants, William and Marie Averett, appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their action to quiet title through adverse possession to two acres of land. The trial court determined respondent, the Drainage District, held the land for public use and, therefore, the Averetts could not acquire title by adverse possession. Alternatively, the trial court concluded the Averetts failed to prove they had acquired title by adverse possession. We affirm.

The Drainage District was established pursuant to state statute on November 4, 1918. During 1919 and 1920, the Drainage District…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hammond v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Benton City v. AdrianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Martin v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fries v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API