Legal Opinion

Fries v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 29, 2006No. 20050026-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

{1 Defendant Linda Martin appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Plaintiff Jamie Fries. Specifically, Martin contests the trial court ruling that she could not have acquired by adverse possession a portion of a county alley (the Disputed Tract) that has been fenced as part of her property for more than forty years. In the alternative, Martin argues that the Disputed Tract should not have been awarded solely to Fries, the adjoining property owner, but rather should have been split equally between Martin and Fries, the two abutting landowners. See…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands v. Tooele CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. DCM Investment Corp. v. Pinecrest Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Pioneer Investment & Trust Co. v. Board of EducationUtah Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Higley v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API