Commonwealth v. Szekeresh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
We are asked to determine whether we should extend the rule of law promulgated in Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980), which grants a defendant a new trial after he has shown that he has suffered actual harm and actual prejudice arising from a conflict of interest in his representation following a pre-trial colloquy and subsequent waiver of his Sixth Amendment rights. Appellant, Michael J. Szekeresh, asks us to extend this rule to include the situation where the pre-trial colloquy informs the defendant of the specific risk of forfeiture of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RogalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. MacKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In the Interest of SaladinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. VegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Tarnopolski v. COM, DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.