In the Interest of Saladin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
At appellant’s delinquency hearing, counsel for the juvenile advised the court that a conflict of interest prevented him from effectively cross-examining a prosecution witness. He orally moved to withdraw as counsel.
The issue before us is whether the trial court erred by insisting that counsel continue to represent appellant under these circumstances. We find that the trial court abused its discretion. We vacate judgment and remand for a new hearing.
I
This case concerns the legal rights of two juveniles, the appellant Lloyd Saladin, and the prosecution witness, Lewis Williams. On…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sullivan v. CuylerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. KarenbauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Commonwealth v. PaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.