Ruckstell Sales & Mfg. Co. v. Perfecto Gear Differential Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge.
On exceptions by defendants to report of special master recommending decree in favor of plaintiff.
The above-entitled causes were brought, one in the Northern district of California and one in the Southern district.
In the Northern district ease, the Per-fecto Gear Differential Company is the sole defendant. Plaintiff in that case set up first a cause of action for breach of a patent license contract. It was there charged that defendant had, in violation of the obligations assumed under the contract, made licenses to others for the manufacture and sale of a patented device…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Superior Testers, Inc. v. Damco Testers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- (PC) Hesse v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Hesse v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Martin v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Martinez v. RojasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.