Legal Opinion

Ruckstell Sales & Mfg. Co. v. Perfecto Gear Differential Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 5, 1928No. 1621; No. K-31-JPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

On exceptions by defendants to report of special master recommending decree in favor of plaintiff.

The above-entitled causes were brought, one in the Northern district of California and one in the Southern district.

In the Northern district ease, the Per-fecto Gear Differential Company is the sole defendant. Plaintiff in that case set up first a cause of action for breach of a patent license contract. It was there charged that defendant had, in violation of the obligations assumed under the contract, made licenses to others for the manufacture and sale of a patented device…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Superior Testers, Inc. v. Damco Testers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  2. (PC) Hesse v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Hesse v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (PC) Martin v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PC) Martinez v. RojasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API