Legal Opinion
Superior Testers, Inc. v. Damco Testers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided January 15, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 69-726PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge.
Superior Testers, Inc. (Superior) seeks an injunction on the grounds that Damco Testers, Inc. (Damco) and certain of its officers, directors, and stockholders are violating Superior’s exclusive patent license by making and using pipe testing equipment in Louisiana and are unfairly competing with Superior. The sole basis asserted for jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. § 13381 and Superior’s allegation that the suit arises under the patent laws of the United States.
While the amended complaint asserted a claim for patent infringement, the defendants’ answers, and the evidence…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Sue Boelens, Individually and as Next Friend of Julie Boelens and Jennifer Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc. & Republic Homes of Texas, Inc., Sue Boelens, Individually and as Next Friend of Julie Boelens and Jennifer Boelens, Cross-Appellee v. Redman Homes, Inc., Cross-Appellant, and Republic Homes of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985