Legal Opinion

(PC) Martin v. Knight

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 29, 2024No. 1:22-cv-01582Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMAR MARTIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01582-NODJ-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER – NOTICE AND WARNING OF 13 v. REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 KNIGHT, et al., MOTION 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 40) 16 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Omar Martin (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 20 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Knight…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Earnest Woods, II v. Tom CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Ruckstell Sales & Mfg. Co. v. Perfecto Gear Differential Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API