Legal Opinion

C & L INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Kiviranta

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2005No. A-03-630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

C&L Industries, Inc. (C&L), appeals from an order of the district court finding that a covenant not to compete signed by C&L’s former employee, Virginia Kiviranta, is unenforceable as written because it is overly broad as well as unduly harsh and oppressive. On appeal, C&L asserts that the district court erred in finding the covenant unenforceable and in making various evidentiary rulings. Kiviranta cross-appeals and asserts that the district court erred in not granting Kiviranta’s motions for directed verdict. We find that the covenant is properly limited to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. SalmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Polly v. Ray D. Hilderman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Moore v. Eggers Consulting Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. American Security Services, Inc. v. VodraNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Kistco Company v. GlodowskiDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  3. Palmer & Cay of Georgia, Inc. v. Lockton Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API