Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. Salmen
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
The plaintiff-appellant, Philip G. Johnson & Co. (Johnson), brought an action for an accounting and to recover damages from one of its former partners, Robert S. Salmen, the defendant-appellee. Salmen counterclaimed for damages and prejudgment interest.
Johnson appeals from the decree of the trial court which refused to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in the partnership agreement between it and Salmen. Salmen cross-appeals from that portion of the decree which denies him recovery of a share of the proceeds resulting from the sale of certain partnership assets and denies prejudgment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lewis v. Krueger, Hutchinson and Overton ClinicTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Wood v. MayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Ceresia v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- Securities Acceptance Corporation v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- BDO Seidman v. HirshbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.