Legal Opinion

Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. Salmen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1982No. 44083PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

The plaintiff-appellant, Philip G. Johnson & Co. (Johnson), brought an action for an accounting and to recover damages from one of its former partners, Robert S. Salmen, the defendant-appellee. Salmen counterclaimed for damages and prejudgment interest.

Johnson appeals from the decree of the trial court which refused to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in the partnership agreement between it and Salmen. Salmen cross-appeals from that portion of the decree which denies him recovery of a share of the proceeds resulting from the sale of certain partnership assets and denies prejudgment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Krueger, Hutchinson and Overton ClinicTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wood v. MayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ceresia v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  5. Securities Acceptance Corporation v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. BDO Seidman v. HirshbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API