Legal Opinion

Rores v. Passidomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner contends that because there was an unreasonable delay in holding administrative hearings on pending charges, *1067they must be dismissed. The charges against petitioner were filed in May 1980 and the administrative hearing was held in September 1981. Inasmuch as the delay was not unreasonable and petitioner has made no showing of prejudice, there is no basis for dismissal of the charges (see, Matter of Rores v Passidomo, 104 AD2d 727; Matter of Axelrod [Walia], 103 AD2d 1007; Matter of Geary v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collins v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Matter of Geary v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Geary v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Cocilova v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Rores v. PassidomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffith v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau of State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API