Legal Opinion

Rores v. Passidomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 21, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Although there was a substantial delay in holding an administrative hearing on the charges against petitioner, such delay did not operate to oust the agency of jurisdiction. Petitioner failed to establish that any evidence was lost or that any witnesses became unavailable as a result of the delay and thus has not made a showing of substantial prejudice (see Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816; Matter of Geary v Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 92 AD2d 38, affd 59 NY2d 950;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Matter of Geary v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Geary v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Doino v. LaehyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Cocilova v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morette v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Rores v. PassidomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API