Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Appeals Board of Administrative Adjudication Bureau of State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 (d) (1) is supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed (see, Matter of McKenzie v Fisher, 39 NY2d 103; Matter of Rores v Passidomo, 109 AD2d 1066). Although petitioner testified that *946the light had turned to green by the time she entered the intersection from the west and collided with a car operated by Edwin Pytell traveling north on the intersecting street, there is testimony that the signal light facing the Pytell car…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. McKenzie v. FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Ray v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Rores v. PassidomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ballen v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API