Nolan v. Nolan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
In his initial assignment of error the plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in its determination that the two children of plaintiff who were over the age of eighteen were entitled to increased child support payments. The fact that the parties have entered into a separation agreement providing for support payments does not deprive the courts of their inherent as well as statutory authority to protect the interests and provide for the welfare of minors. Fuchs v. Fuchs, 260 N.C. 635, 133 S.E. 2d 487 (1963); Story v. Story, 221 N.C. 114, 19 S.E. 2d 136 (1942). See also,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Story v. . StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Crouch v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Calhoun v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Warner v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Warner v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Harding v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Appelbe v. AppelbeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.