Harding v. Harding
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion “that all support for all the children more than eighteen years of age be discontinued.” On 5 July 1971, after entry of the original consent decree but before entry of any of the subsequent orders, G.S. 48A-2 became effective. It provides that “[a] minor is any person who has not reached the age of 18 years.” In light of this statute, the authority of the court to require support for a normal child as a ward of the court ceases when the child becomes eighteen. Shoaf v. Shoaf, 282 N.C. 287, 192 S.E. 2d 299 (1972) ; Nolan…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Shoaf v. ShoafSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Nolan v. NolanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Waller v. WallerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowden v. BowdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Harding v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Bottomley v. BottomleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Estate of Waters v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994