Legal Opinion

Ames v. Senco Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order vacating service of process on foreign corporation unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. While it is true that the limitation on service of process on foreign corporations has been lifted to a considerable extent by the United States Supreme Court in International Shoe Co. v. Washington (326 U. S. 310), the settled rule as to the extent or exercise of our jurisdiction in this State has not been changed. Moreover, there are policy considerations which suggest that any change should be effected by legislation rather than by judicial decision. In that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mirabella v. Banco Industrial de la Republica ArgentinaNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Majique Fashions Ltd. v. Warwick & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. A. J. McNulty & Co. v. RocamatNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API