Legal Opinion
Majique Fashions Ltd. v. Warwick & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bentley Kassal, J.
Defendant, Warwick & Company, Ltd. (Warwick), moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], pars 8, 9) for an order dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
FACTS
Jurisdiction over Warwick, a Hong Kong corporation, is premised upon an attachment (pursuant to an ex parte order) of its bank account of approximately $74,000, maintained by defendant at the French-American Banking Corporation, a *809New York City bank. The uncontroverted facts are that defendant’s only contact with the State of New York was the maintenance of said bank account.
Warwick is not a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- M. Katz & Son Billiard Products, Inc. v. G. Correale & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- M. Katz & Son Billiard Products, Inc. v. G. Correale & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Fremay, Inc. v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Papendick v. Robert Bosch GmbHSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Grove Valve & Regulator Co. v. Iranian Oil Services Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980