Legal Opinion
A. J. McNulty & Co. v. Rocamat
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1986Published
1Opinion of the Court
*1065OPINION OF THE COURT
Lester Sacks, J.
The defendants, Rocamat and Societe Francaise D’Assurance de Cautionnement, brought this motion to dismiss because of the failure of the plaintiff to serve process upon the defendants pursuant to the Hague Convention (20 US Treaties 361).
It is conceded by the defendants that service has been made pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 307. It is their contention, however, that such service was improper because both are foreign corporations, not licensed to do business in the State of New York and, they allege, have not done business in the State of New York…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Miller v. Surf Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Fremay, Inc. v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Boryk v. Aerolineas ArgentinasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Ames v. Senco Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955