Legal Opinion

Texas National Bank v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 6, 2009No. 07-355CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion of the United States (“government” or “defendant”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). In this action, the plaintiff, Texas National Bank (“Texas National,” “the bank,” or “plaintiff”),1 claims that All Star Iron Works (“All Star”) assigned its rights to payment for work on a contract with the U.S. Customs Service, now Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”), to Texas National but that the government failed to make the payments to Texas National as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Atkins North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Paktin Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API