Legal Opinion

Perlmutter v. Minskoff

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 19, 1950No. [No. 211, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal by Morris Perlmutter from a decree sustaining appellee’s demurrer and dismissing appellant’s bill of complaint as amended and supplemented, without leave to further amend. In referring to appellees and defendants in this case we are not referring to Home Life Insurance Company, which is primarily a stakeholder. The appellant claimed money due under contracts.

The bill, as amended and supplemented, alleges the following facts which are taken in part from the facts as summarized by the appellant, and in part from the amended and supplemental bill.

“The individual appellees were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Blondheim v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  3. Executors of Fooks v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Kernan v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  5. Conner v. Groh, Doub & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Simon v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Dormay Construction Corp. v. Doric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Brucker v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API