Adams v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
No statement is required.
1Opinion of the Court
HEHDERSOH, Judge.
The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on alleged defects in the recognizance— first, because the recognizance does not conclude as is required by article 887, Code of Criminal Procedure, in that it omits to conclude with the phrase “in this case ;” second, that the recognizance binds appellant to appear “to abide the judgment of the Criminal Court of Appeals of this State.” The form prescribed by the statute requires appellant to appear in order to “abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas in this case.” In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cryer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Darnell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Landrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Rippey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Harden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911