Legal Opinion

Landrum v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1961No. 33263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, Judge

This is a bond forfeiture proceedings.

Motion to quash the citation was predicated upon the fact that the bond was conditioned, and the judgment nisi recites, that the principal was to appear in the 22nd Criminal District Court of Comal County, Texas, whereas neither of the two District Courts in and for Comal County contains the word “Criminal” in its statutory designation and the bond was actually forfeited in the 22nd District Court of Comal County.

Bonds v. State 162 Tex. Cr. R. 419, 286 S.W. 2d 313, relied upon by appellant, is not here controlling because in that case the condition of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Mullins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blaine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  5. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API