Harden v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss this appeal because the recognizance contained in the record does not comply with the Acts of the Twenty-fifth Legislature, 1897, and the prescribed form as found in article 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The recognizance in this particular case fails to recite the amount .of the fine or punishment assessed against appellant, and it also fails to conclude with the words “in this case” as is prescribed in said form. The motion is well taken. Walker v. State, 56 S. W. Rep., 913; McDade v. State, 56 S.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968