Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Curtis & Pope Lumber Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 30, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The material facts concerning the relation of the parties to the transactions as alleged in the bill as amended having been stated in Flynn v. Curtis & Pope *354Lumber Co. 245 Mass. 291, when this case was first before us upon report, it is unnecessary to restate them, and the following decree, from which no appeal was taken, was entered after rescript:
“This cause came on to be heard at this sitting of the court upon the substitute bill of complaint and the answers thereto, and the report of the master and the exceptions to the same, and upon the rescript of the Supreme Judicial Court, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lorain Steel Co. v. Norfolk & Bristol Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Arnold v. MaxwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Hayes v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Morse v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Dennett v. Norwood Housing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robertson v. HirshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Dobias v. FaldynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931