Legal Opinion

Morse v. Hill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1883PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

In 1872, four persons, who had been appointed trustees under the will of Thomas Whittemore, sold and conveyed, through one Comee, to Otis T. Ruggles and Joseph Whittemore, two of their number, six fourteenths of a leasehold estate in Cornhill in Boston, belonging to the trust; and this bill in equity is brought by the present trustee and three beneficiaries under the will, for the purpose of obtaining a reconveyance of this property to the trust, and for other incidental relief.

The four trustees were Otis T. Ruggles and John E. Cowles, sons in law of the testator, and Joseph Whittemore and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  2. Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Learned v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Clark v. BlackingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Morgan v. RotchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Union Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Hill v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Warren v. PazoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Thomas v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Jose v. LymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API