Arnold v. Maxwell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The defendant Maxwell, to whom we shall hereafter
refer as the defendant, having waived his exceptions to the master’s report and his appeal from the order of the single justice * declining to recommit, the question for decision is whether upon the master’s findings the bill can be maintained.
“It is an elementary rule of equity pleading, that the bill must contain a clear and exact statement of all the material facts upon which the plaintiff’s right to the relief sought depends, and that he can only introduce evidence of such facts as are thus stated.” Drew v. Beard, 107 Mass. 64, 73. The bill…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Batman v. MegowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Ginn v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- United Zinc Companies v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Hawkes v. LackeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- McMurtrie v. GuilerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cardullo v. LandauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Shulkin v. ShulkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Mendelsohn v. Leather Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Flint v. CodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.