Legal Opinion

Jason Alan Smith v. City of Renton et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 24, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00128Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 JASON ALAN SMITH, CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00128-JNW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER REVIEWING PLAINTIFF’S 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER 28 v. U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B) 10 CITY OF RENTON et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 1. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Jason Alan Smith proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP). On 16 July 22, 2026, the Court dismissed Smith’s complaint in part under 28 U.S.C. 17 § 1915(e)(2)(B), with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 13. Smith filed an amended 18 complaint on August 3 that raises five claims: (1) a First Amendment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Nieves v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API