State v. Flanagan
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Indictment.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.
This indictment charges that the defendant “unlawfully did practice medicine for reward and compensation without first having obtained a certificate from the State. Board of Health, and without possessing any of the qualifications set forth in Gen. Laws cap. 165, § 3.”
Section 6 of said chapter provi4es that nothing therein contained shall apply to gratuitous services in cases of emergency; to commissioned surgeons in the United States army, navy, or marine hospital service; or to legally qualified physicians of another State, called to see a particular case, who do not open an office or…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. RolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1918