Legal Opinion

State v. Flanagan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 22, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, C. J.

This indictment charges that the defendant “unlawfully did practice medicine for reward and compensation without first having obtained a certificate from the State. Board of Health, and without possessing any of the qualifications set forth in Gen. Laws cap. 165, § 3.”

Section 6 of said chapter provi4es that nothing therein contained shall apply to gratuitous services in cases of emergency; to commissioned surgeons in the United States army, navy, or marine hospital service; or to legally qualified physicians of another State, called to see a particular case, who do not open an office or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. RolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. United States v. ScottDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API