Legal Opinion

Tolle v. Orth

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7680PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Action for the recovery of rent of real estate. Error is assigned upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which is asked for the alleged reason that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence.

The evidence shows that the appellee, Godlove S. Orth, leased the premises, a store-room in Lafayette, to Jacob Stahl and Reinhold Fritch, for the period of five years, ending November 1st, 1877, at an annual rent of seven hundred and twenty dollars, which the lessees agreed to pay in equal instalments at the end of each month. The lessees, as partners in trade, manufactured and sold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thiebaud v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bright v. McOuatIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Burbank v. DyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Gordon v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Coomler v. HefnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bollenbacker v. FrittsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Burdick Tire & Rubber Co. v. HeylmannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Ives v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Rothschild v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API