Legal Opinion
Arnott v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 2, 1993No. 1823 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, Judge.
Brian Arnott (claimant) petitions for review of the July 28, 1992 order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the referee’s April 1, 1991 decision which: (1) dismissed the petition to terminate claimant’s compensation benefits filed by Sheehy Ford Sales, Inc. (employer); but (2) granted employer’s petition for review, treating it as a petition for suspension of benefits under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act). 1 We affirm.
This matter came before the Board three times as a result of a procedural history that is detailed by the referee in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Baksalary v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Coover v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Moody v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Farance v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Lakomy v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Chicoine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.